What to Expect When You Contact Us?
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 2 – Definition of Child for Citizenship and Naturalization
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 3 – United States Citizens at Birth (INA 301 and 309)
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 4 – Automatic Acquisition of Citizenship after Birth (INA 320)
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 5 – Child Residing Outside of the United States (INA 322)
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 2 – Definition of Child for Citizenship and Naturalization
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 3 – United States Citizens at Birth (INA 301 and 309)
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 4 – Automatic Acquisition of Citizenship after Birth (INA 320)
-
USCIS Policy Manual, Chapter 5 – Child Residing Outside of the United States (INA 322)
Human Rights Advocates
-
Order for Restoring Peace on Earth (ORPE)
Restoring Human Dignity: A Divine Mandate and a Commitment to Advancing the Rule of Law
We commit to intervening wherever human dignity is violated, fundamental rights are undermined, or justice is denied, taking every action within our capacity to uphold human rights, honor divine law, and preserve the rule of law.
Email: advocacy@orpe.org
Tel: +1 202-972-5030
Why do Orpe Human Rights Advocates want to Engage in the Project of Indigents Defense before Immigration Court?
The reason why Orpe Human Rights Advocates wants to engage in the project of defending indigent immigrants in the immigration court is drawn on the premise of fulfilling its divine mission of defending the cause of those who cannot assert their own fundamental rights.
​
If you are required to attend a removal or deportation hearing before an Immigration Judge, keep in mind that it is important to knock the doors of an experienced and knowledgeable deportation defense advocate to accompany you into the courtroom. Because chance is high you will face an experienced attorney who will be representing the government and who probably has appeared in hundreds of deportation hearings. If your attorney or the advocate who is representing you is not knowledgeable or experienced in deportation defense, you will be at a distinct disadvantage. Many indigents people with compelling cases had appeared at their removal hearings without an attorney because they could not afford the services of a private attorney and also there were no services of nonprofits like OHRA available ended up being deported. This is what constitutes the reason why Orpe Human Rights Advocates is engaged in the path of assisting genuine people with genuine cases facing deportation who otherwise would have been granted relief but could not because of their inability to afford the services of a private lawyer.
​
All immigrants including indigents immigrants have the constitutional right of effectively being represented by a competent advocate or lawyer. In addition, case law shows that the government has been arguing that immigrants have a right to counsel in immigration court, but that expense has generally been borne by the noncitizen who in most cases are indigents who are unable to afford the services of a private attorney. Because deportation is classified as a civil rather than a criminal sanction, immigrants facing removal are not afforded the constitutional protections under the Sixth Amendment that are provided to criminal defendants.
​
Sometimes, because of the lack of an effective representation, indigents tend to self-incriminate themselves by creating a record before the Immigration Judge. If they lose and then have a possibility to hire a new and better attorney to appeal the Judge’s decision, the judge will be saddled with the record of proceedings that indigents have created themselves before the Judge. The record of proceedings consists of the transcript of the hearing and the exhibits, including copies of any applications submitted on behalf of behalf the client. If you do not make a good record before the Judge, it may be difficult for your new deportation attorney to win your appeal. This is what used to happened to indigents.
​
Note that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) is located in Falls Church, Virginia. The BIA never sees nor hears from you. They only see the printed record, the decision of the Immigration Judge, and the attorneys’ legal briefs. If the BIA rules against you and you finally have the opportunity to hire a great immigration attorney to take your case to Federal Court, the court must rely on the record of proceedings. You never get the chance to testify in court.
Deportation Defense Advisory
​
-
Supreme Court to Hear Immigrant’s Reversal of a Plea in an Attempt to Avoid Deportation (3-24-17)
-
9th Circuit Rejects “Departure Bar” to Reopening Deportation Cases (6-03-21)
-
Attorney General Holder Reverses “No Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel” Decision (6-03-09)Immigration Benefits in EOIR Removal Proceedings (USCIS)
-
Administrative Closure and Motions to Recalendar (June 2017)
-
Immigration Judges Headed to 12 US Cities to Speed Deportations (3-17-17)
-
Court Deportations Drop 43 Percent in Past Five Years (4-16-14)
-
Court Orders DHS to Provide Representation to Mentally Disabled Detainees (4-23-13)
​
-
Fajardo vs. INS (9th Cir. 2002)
-
Socop-Gonzalez v. INS – En Banc (9th Cir. 2001)
-
Jobe vs. INS – 238 F.3d 96 – En Banc (1st Cir. 2001)
-
Mejia-Hernandez vs. Holder (9th Cir. 2011)
-
Varela vs. INS – 204 F.3d 1237 (9th Cir. 2000)
-
Singh v. Gonzales (9th Cir. 2007)
-
Albillo-De Leon v. Gonzales (9th Cir. 2005)
-
Lopez vs. INS – 184 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 1999)
-
Practice Advisory: Motions to Suppress in Removal Proceedings – General Overview (8-01-17)
- Immigration Judge Marks’ Comments to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (June 2006)
-
Calcano-Martinez vs. INS: Supreme Court Holds That Right to Habeas Corpus Preserved For Persons Challenging Orders of Removal (6-25-01)
Deportation Defense Resources
-
Prosecuting People for Coming to the United States (12-04-19)
-
Recent Deportation Proceedings Filed in Immigration Court (thru 2020)
-
Motions to Suppress in Removal Proceedings: A General Overview (8-01-17)
-
Motions to Suppress in Removal Proceedings: Cracking Down on Fourth Amendment Violations (8-01-17)
-
Federal Court Blocks Trump Fast-Track Deportation Policy (9-18-19)
-
Seeking Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Immigration Cases (1-29-16)
-
Prosecutorial Discretion: How to Advocate for Your Client (3-18-15)
-
The President’s Discretion, Immigration Enforcement, and the Rule of Law (08-26-14)
-
Groups Sue Trump Administration Over Fast-Track Deportations (8-6-19)
-
Seeking a Judicial Stay of Removal in the Court of Appeals (1-21-14)
-
Departure Bar to Motions to Reopen and Reconsider: Legal Overview and Related Issues (11-20-13)
-
Return to the United States After Prevailing on a Petition for Review or Motion to Reopen (12-21-12)
-
The Criminal Justice Act: Appointment of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Proceedings (8-01-09)
-
Voluntary Departure: Automatic Termination and the Harsh Consequences of Failing to Depart (7-06-09)
-
Electronic Filing and Access to Electronic Federal Court Documents (4-13-09)
-
Finality of Removal Orders for Judicial Review Purposes (8-05-08)
-
BIA “Affirmance Without Opinion”: What Federal Court Challenges Remain? (4-27-05)
-
St. Cyr Regulations and Strategies for Applicants Barred from Section 212(C) Relief (10-19-04)
​
Related Issues:​​